Stand Apart From Being Apart: Reading Jenny Odell Reading Epicurus

https://cruzn.medium.com/stand-apart-from-being-apart-reading-jenny-odell-reading-epicurus-4cd57bbdbf8e

The book I selected to discuss in How to Do Nothing was Principal Doctrines by the Greek Philosopher Epicurus. However, my essay focuses more on his ideas and specifically his Garden Commune that Odell talks about. In essence, I explain how Odell and Epicurus are both attacking similar problems that humans face from social fabrics but argue that they are offering different solutions. Although Odell does not mention it much in her book, I also touch base with the philosophy of happiness or peace of mind and try to tie it in with each person’s solution because in the end, I believe that Odell and Epicurus both truly want their followers to be happy.

“…as far as you try an escape, deep down, you will always know that these problems still exist in the world and that you are simply living in a false comforted reality. “

Writing 11 – Period of Removal: to Restart, Reset, or Restore?

Throughout How to Do Nothing and especially in the first half of the book, Jenny Odell often mentions the idea of a period of removal in taking a stance against the attention economy. My essay delves into the different periods of removal that Odell mentions and which one she is encouraging the reader to experience. I compare the possibilities of a period of removal to the technology function definitions of a restart, reset, and restore. In essence, a restart is doing too little because there is no change and a restore is doing too much because it tries to completely start over. My aim was to ultimately argue and try to prove that Odell is asking for the fine line in a period of removal where the reader experiences a reset.

The essay includes four body paragraphs with examples and explanations of each definition (restart, reset, restore) and also includes a personal period of removal where I experienced a reset. An interesting quote from the explanation of a restore is “A period of removal where one is searching for a complete restore in their life will lead them into a deep state of insanity where they do the same thing over and over expecting a different result.” This teaser reiterates the idea both Odell and I agree with that a restore is actually impossible to achieve.

https://medium.com/@cruzn/period-of-removal-to-restart-reset-or-restore-5bd914441978

What Does a “Reset” Really Mean?

Throughout “How to Do Nothing,” Odell continuously mentions the idea of a person going through a period of removal “…that fundamentally changed their attitude to the world they returned to.” She argues that it is through these experiences where real change occurs and one can finally resist the attention economy.  It is important to understand that when Odell is talking about these retreats of doing “nothing” she is urging the reader to experience a reset rather than a simple pause of their life. This is because to pause means simply to temporarily stop and eventually return back to its normal state, whereas the idea of resetting suggests that there must be actual change occurring which is what Odell is encouraging. 

She uses various examples to back this idea of a reset such as the revolutionary experiences and stories of Levi Felix, her father, Michael Weiss, and others. This is made clearer in chapter 2 when she says “I’ve already written that the “doing nothing” I propose is more than a weekend retreat.” The story of Odell’s father returning to reality after quitting his job and living cheaply for two years struck me in particular. During his Journey, he learned not only to understand his anger but also found a new compassion for creativity and openness. “With renewed energy and a different perspective on his job, he went from technician to engineer, and has filed around twelve patents so far.” This story is remarkable and as she sums up “… made him understand himself not in relation to that world, but just to the world, and forever after that, things that happened at work only seemed like one small part of something much larger.” Although this experience is amazing, the truth is revelations like these are rare to come across and it feels like Odell is neglecting the smaller stories that  have a minor change in one’s life but still yields great importance. 

These examples that Odell uses lead me to believe that she is looking at the definition of reset through the lens of a computer’s definition which implies a complete overhaul of its settings or a massive change in a person’s view of life . Personally, one issue I find with this idea is that she seems to say that a reset is black and white and can only be done on a large scale to really resist the attention economy. Although I agree that a reset is necessary to resist, I believe a reset should be seen as any  form of adjustment that results in being different whether it be on a large scale or a small scale. It is important to recognize that there are minor instances of removals that can still teach an individual how to grow and even resist the attention economy.

Truthfully, I have never had a period of removal from the attention economy that would be considered a massive reset with tremendous change such as the examples Odell gives us from Levi Felix, her father, Michael Weiss, and others. However, one sort of disconnect that brought about great change in my life was the summer going into 7th grade when my parents sent my cousins and I to live with my grandparents in Brazil for four weeks. There, we stayed on my grandfather’s coffee farm which spanned around 35 acres with no internet. At first, I remember being an obnoxious middle schooler furious that I could not use any social media or play any games, but as time went on I learned to enjoy myself and live in the moment. I remember traversing the large plantations with my cousins, fishing for food, eating guava from the trees, and listening to my grandfather play his beloved accordion at night whilst I layed on a hammock looking up to the stars. This small experience also taught me the idea Odell brings up of sensitivity versus connectivity. I realized the face to face moments I had with my cousins and grandparents will never amount to any online interaction we will ever have. Going to Brazil for four weeks may not seem like a long period of removal in the eyes of Odell, and may have not changed my entire view on life like the people that she mentions, but it was still a significant experience that helped me in a strange part of my life. The temporary raw lifestyle that I had to live, manifested into me and taught me to appreciate the value of family and the roots of where my family came from. It also helped me see that I previously had a dependence on the internet and that there are other things in the world that I gain happiness and productivity from. 

Although this experience that I went through was not a radical change in my life that Odell suggests is necessary, I learned a lot about my family, myself, and even the attention economy.  Of course I still use social media and browse the attention economy regularly, I have learned to disregard the negativity and truly not care about factors such as likes and followers. Furthermore I do not get bothered by political posts and would rather ignore them as I know they are designed to intentionally hook me in. Overall, although Odell’s idea of a reset being necessary rather than just a simple pause in one’s life to resist the attention economy holds true, I believe that this reset does not have to be a massive life changing experience. Instead it could be obtained and seen as any adjustment in one’s life that inspires a new understanding or change whether it be small or large.

Writing 2: Activist Disguised as a Self-Help Book

After reading the Introduction and the first chapter in How to Do Nothing by Jenny Odell, I felt almost completely lost in what she was trying to say and struggled to pinpoint the main idea of the book. Reading it felt like she was just pouring out thoughts from her brain as she went along writing. Odell even confesses this stating “The arguments and observations I’ll make here are not neat, interlocking parts in a logical whole. Rather, I saw and experienced many things during the course of writing it—things that changed my mind and then changed it again, and which I folded in as I went. I came out of this book different than I went in.” Here, she is admitting that this is not a structured book following a main idea, but rather share experiences that are meant to challenge the reader’s mind. Odell gives a hint into her true project of this book towards the end of the introduction where she states “At some point, I began to think of this as an activist book disguised as a self-help book” (xxii).” Here, she makes clear that the project of this book is to encourage the reader to take an active stance against the attention economy by doing “nothing.” Odell considers this process in two parts, the first part being to disconnect and see the problematic effects of the attention economy.

Odell explains her strong distaste for the attention economy which she believes only seeks to keep users hooked for as long as possible. She prefaces this by saying that she is not against technology but “Rather, I am opposed to the way that corporate platforms buy and sell our attention, as well as to designs and uses of technology that enshrine a narrow definition of productivity…” By taking a step back, Odell explains that attention economy companies such as social media platforms are always seeking to add features to keep you addicted due to their financial incentive. She believes that this financial incentive is meant to “keep us in a profitable state of anxiety, envy, and distraction.” These negative effects of social media along with the “the right not to express oneself” are the main driving force behind Odell’s project to take a stand against the attention economy. 

The second part of the process is doing nothing to go against the attention economy system. When Odell says that she wants the reader to fight back and do nothing, she does not literally mean do nothing. She introduces this by urging the reader to ask themselves and re-evaluate what the meaning of the word productive, or rather unproductive, is. Odell clarifies that the term unproductive is defined by what the capitalist economy deems to be not useful or profitable. However, this capitalist view fails to see the importance and actual value to doing activities that are so called “unproductive.” Odell uses this capitalist definition of unproductive to explain doing nothing. She  this by giving various examples of personal experiences where she does “nothing” but gains immeasurable benefits that a capitalistic view would consider 

The first material that she mentions is the Rose Garden in Oakland, California. She uses the Rose Garden first because it was where she began brainstorming her book and as she said “… had encompassed everything I wanted to cover: the practice of doing nothing, the architecture of nothing, the importance of public space, and an ethics of care and maintenance.” Odell ties this to her project stating “those spaces deemed commercially unproductive are always under threat, since what they “produce” can’t be measured or exploited or even easily identified—despite the fact that anyone in the neighborhood can tell you what an immense value the garden provides.” Here, Odell explains exactly why a capitalist is wrong in assuming that the Rose Garden is unproductive as it proves to be of significant use to the neighborhood that offers not profits, but nature’s beauty, which should be valued. 

Jenny Odell project is again asking the reader to fight back against the attention economy by doing nothing. Her plan is for the reader to first recognize that the attention economy is negative to an individual’s ability to express themselves and is intended to be as addictive as possible. I can think of many scenarios where this is true such as when a group of friends are hanging out and everyone is one their phone. They are  inherently saying that instead of living in the moment, they would rather be submitting to the attention economy. The second part of her project is to do nothing which is like hitting the reset button and taking a step back from the attention economy. This is to not only to resist the attention economy’s dangerous addiction but also to help an individual learn and grow.